<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bajaj Genie is not for &#8216;common type&#8217; mindsets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lbhat.com/advertising/bajaj-genie-is-not-for-common-type-mindsets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lbhat.com/advertising/bajaj-genie-is-not-for-common-type-mindsets/</link>
	<description>Ramblings on Advertising, Apple and New Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 13:33:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bhatnaturally</title>
		<link>http://www.lbhat.com/advertising/bajaj-genie-is-not-for-common-type-mindsets/comment-page-1/#comment-3329</link>
		<dc:creator>bhatnaturally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 14:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lbhat.com/?p=4067#comment-3329</guid>
		<description>Charles, perhaps the ad  sends conflicting messages. While dissing the &#039;ordinary&#039; (dull &amp; boring) choices the common man makes, they show him satisfied with his current choice (an ordinary bike). If the message is &#039;not for ordinary folks&#039; will sting them enough to consider the Bajaj XCD?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charles, perhaps the ad  sends conflicting messages. While dissing the &#8216;ordinary&#8217; (dull &#038; boring) choices the common man makes, they show him satisfied with his current choice (an ordinary bike). If the message is &#8216;not for ordinary folks&#8217; will sting them enough to consider the Bajaj XCD?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charles</title>
		<link>http://www.lbhat.com/advertising/bajaj-genie-is-not-for-common-type-mindsets/comment-page-1/#comment-3321</link>
		<dc:creator>charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 04:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lbhat.com/?p=4067#comment-3321</guid>
		<description>Also how does this tie into Bajaj XCD 135 Twisted Sisters&#039; as a brand. I don&#039;t see what the brand stands for apart from fantasy so far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also how does this tie into Bajaj XCD 135 Twisted Sisters&#8217; as a brand. I don&#8217;t see what the brand stands for apart from fantasy so far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charles</title>
		<link>http://www.lbhat.com/advertising/bajaj-genie-is-not-for-common-type-mindsets/comment-page-1/#comment-3320</link>
		<dc:creator>charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 04:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lbhat.com/?p=4067#comment-3320</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t understand the dialogue but it&#039;s not hugely difficult to work out. OK. For me it&#039;s got some nice points. Production is good. Probably makes it implicit that the product is not as expensive as others (luxury house scenario?)

But in principle it&#039;s saying the product is both non aspirational and aspirational. 

Which is a conflict. 

I think ideas like durability, replaceable inexpensive parts, running costs, birth of a new and progressive India would be interesting if relevant.

The guy comes across as a bit dim in the beginning and savvier at the end. Which can be read negatively or as a minute long odyssey. It&#039;s tough in any case as the real brief is to intellectually stretch the customer. Make them realise what they didn&#039;t before and I don&#039;t think a Genie feels like a fresh way of conveying that. Of course it&#039;s always easy to criticize but it would be interesting if Bajaj XCD sales were given to us a year down the line. Something we just don&#039;t do enough of in this business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t understand the dialogue but it&#8217;s not hugely difficult to work out. OK. For me it&#8217;s got some nice points. Production is good. Probably makes it implicit that the product is not as expensive as others (luxury house scenario?)</p>
<p>But in principle it&#8217;s saying the product is both non aspirational and aspirational. </p>
<p>Which is a conflict. </p>
<p>I think ideas like durability, replaceable inexpensive parts, running costs, birth of a new and progressive India would be interesting if relevant.</p>
<p>The guy comes across as a bit dim in the beginning and savvier at the end. Which can be read negatively or as a minute long odyssey. It&#8217;s tough in any case as the real brief is to intellectually stretch the customer. Make them realise what they didn&#8217;t before and I don&#8217;t think a Genie feels like a fresh way of conveying that. Of course it&#8217;s always easy to criticize but it would be interesting if Bajaj XCD sales were given to us a year down the line. Something we just don&#8217;t do enough of in this business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
